Re: nArAyananE, namakkE
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 7, 1997
Dear Sri Varadhan, thanks for your personal note and as well as this. Prior to going into the subject i wanna make a small note. Actually I have written that "in sequence of all pasurams of thiruppavai prior to this pasuram", it is to be read that the sequence of all pasurams of thiruppavai itself, in one way. On a second way it is also to be seen that the sequence of periyazhwar thirumozhi prior to this thirppavai is the premisese for presenting the "bAlyam" stages of Lord Krishna and establishing that HE is the only ultimate. And that ANDAL had the "mindset" already from her father's pasurams that were delivered chronologically prior to that. There are certain flow among all the 4000 pasurrams the way in which they are delivered. We discussed a small example on pasurams of thiru viN Nagaram as to how nammalwar's last and thirumangai's first were connected in one sequential incident of vamana thiruvikrama avatharam. Similarly periyazhwars' pasuram and andal's pasuram are also connected in flow and thiruppavai researcheers may want to (already are) take closer look at this. Coming to the first way,and her own pasurams in thirup pavai the vyAkyAnams, it is said that the first pasuram itself conveys the entire thiruppvai itself by presenting both the "prApyam" and the "prAbagam" in it. ie the premeises, introduction and the conclusion are presented as an moderen day "executive summary" in this pAsuram itself. The "prApyam" is delivered by the notion to get together in the first two lines in margazi thingAL to be with Sri Krishna and the "prAbagam" is presented by "nArAyananE parai tharu vAn" (as Narayana HE (Sri Krishna) HIMself, will prtesent the "upAyam"). Hence it is also conceived that if one can chant even this one pasuram alone they will get the benefits of chanting the entire thiruppAvai. Atleast one must bring the thought to their mind on this pasuram and its meaning and it is enough even if they cannot chant this in tamil and it is said that they will also get the benefit of the chanting the entire thiruppavai. > > > Yes! Agian in the flow of these pasaurams the Lord here means Lord > > Krishna. (It seems this gopiyar or nappinai) is aware ahead of time, > > that > > charama slokam is to be delivered. HE (Lord Krishna) did teach to all > > and those > > gOpiyars as well afterwards through Srimad bagwad Geetha the way > > through "Mam > > ekAm charaNam vraja" ("Surender to ME ...") at the end. The very fact > > that this > > is at end of Srimad bagwad Geetha is such that this is the *most* > > important > > purushArththam (prapatti) one "may" perform in his life that will lead > > to > > mOksham. > > > > Not to be nitpicking, but when you say 'surrender to me' > is the upaayam, then the whole meaning of prapatti is lost. The > 'performance' > of prapatti is not what leads to mOksham. We have discussed this before > on the list. (pithaavukku putran ezhuththu vaanguaapOlE..) > Yes you are right ! Logically this statment of mine can be proved wrong. I am wrong in presenting this concept of prapatti by these mere statments and without any details. I was not focussing to go into the debate between our two paths. The object of my post was to present that our school also derives from the same words, the authority for our path while not contradicting the existance of your path. To discuss about prapatti and answer your question, I have presented in detail, in my own of account of my own undertyaking of baranyAsam at Srirangam earlier in this forum. The only and only upAyam is bhakti mArgham. But then we "realise" (due to HIS own grace this realisation takes place) at this moment that our souls have been HIS belonging all the time and that it rightfully belong in there only (with HIM) and therein submit ourselves and surrender to HIM and request HIM one last time with the "I" in mind, to substitute bhakthi mArgam the "upAyam" all by "HIMself" and deliver us the eternal status for this soul with HIM. While doing so we undertake to observe some protocols also. The whole "process" is known as prapatti. Here agian if you go into detail of this process, we request the LORD HIMself to be the upAyam replacing the bhakthi mArgam (as it is extremely difficult for our souls to accomplish). So one can say that the word "prapatti" (meaning surredner) is not an upAya by itself. HOWEVER, We do beleive that Lord agrees to be the "upAya" HIMself in response to our undertaking of prapatti (ie both surrender and and undertakings of protocols) at this moment as conferred by the performing achArYAL who is the representative of the LORD and has the "say" to confer this through a dialogue with the lord by a sequence of slokams (manthrams) in a "request" and "answer" format. Actually achARYAL tells back to us that "Yes, the Lord has now accepted your prapatti and will deliver you the required status at the end of this life for you". HE also waives the requirement for anthima sruthi and assures that there is no need to take any special effort to chant anything or perform anymore yagas to get the anthima nyAnam. Hence we end up calling prapatti process as prapatti itself. Since an upAyam is attained through this process (we beleive the Lord gave the word to us through acharyAL at this moment) it can also be called technically as an upAyam as whole (process). In Sri Ramanuja vaibavam Lord VARADHAR answers that "prapattiyum upAyamE" in those questions and answers. The thenkalai schools also accept this conversation of Lord Varadhar as real. But then what is their vyAkyAnam or interpretation for this. Can you or someother thenkalai bAgwathALs, please explain. I am requesting this just as an info and not as a challenge. Finally if you will agree with Lord varadhar's words as truth, then Will you allow me also to call prapatti as an upAyam and repeat Lord Varadhar's words whatever may the interpretation from one's school for that? Sri Varadhan, I am thrilled at your intelligence and your devotion for prabandam. It is our bAgyam to be in the company of those of you and others who are so closely associated with our achAryAls like Sri prathivAthi bayankaram SwamigaL. I look forward to reading more from you. Please forgive me if I have offended your or anyone else's sentiments in writing these infant observations of mine. It is great to read from your quotes from Sri Periya vAchchan pillai's vyAkyAnams for thiruppAvai which I dnot have. It is "the authority" for all vyAkyAnams undoubtedly as we consider Sri PIllai HIMself to be the incarnation of the of thiruk KaNNa managi perumAL. azhwAR emperumAnAr thiru vadikaLE charaNAm ANDAL thiruvadikaLE charaNam adiyEn Sampth Rengarajan
- Next message: Krishna Kalale: "Re: The greatness of Naama Sankeerthanam: Part 1"
- Previous message: V. Sadagopan: "Altered Sankha -chakra hasthams at ThirukkovalUr"
- Maybe in reply to: Sampath Rengarajan: "Re: nArAyananE, namakkE"
- Next in thread: Thirumalai Anandanpillai: "Re: nArAyananE, namakkE"
- Reply: Thirumalai Anandanpillai: "Re: nArAyananE, namakkE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]