A tale of two thieves
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 23, 2001
Srimate SrivanSatakopa Sri Vedantadesika Yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama: A Tale of Two Thieves ______________________ Azhwars are enamoured of addressing Emperuman as "KaLvA" (thief). Listen to Sri Nammazhwar-"Kalva,emmaiyum Ezhulagum ninnuLLE tOtriya Iraiva" "en pollA karumAnikkamE en KaLvA" "kaLavEzh veNNai toduvunda kaLvA". etc. Sri Tirumangai Mannan is not far behind in calling Him names-"kaLLa kuzhavi", "KaLvA" etc. And what did the Lord do to earn this sobriquet? His most obvious and endearing misdemeanour is that of "navaneeta chouryam" or Butter Theft. The gopis of Sri Gokulam are united in their complaint to Sri Yasodha that ever since Sri Krishna was born, their milk and butter were not their own, and kept disappearing mysteriously ("karanda nar pAlum tayirum kadaindu uri mEl vaittha veNNai, pirandadu mudalAga petrariyEn"). And the culprit, adding insult to injury, not only emptied the pots of butter, but also banged them down, breaking up all the pots. ("VeNNai vizhungi verum kalatthai verpidai ittu adan Osai kEtkum") (uruga vaittha kudatthodu veNNai uricchi udaitthittu pOndu nindrAn").("pAlai Â….sAitthu parugiittu pOndu nindrAn").etc. The poor Lord, unused to thievery, gets caught by the vigilant Gopis, and is roundly cursed ("VeNNai undAn ivan endru Esa nindra emperumAn") and beaten too ("Ayar kozhundAi avarAl pudai uNNum en mAyappirAn"). And ultimately, when the enchanting thief's exploits become unbearable, He is also tied to the grinding stone with the aid of a rope, restricting His movement ("Matthuru kadai veNNai kaLavinil uravidai AppuNdu etthiram uralinOdu iNaindu erindu Engia eLivE"). Itihyam has it that Sri Nammazhwar was so much taken up with this Souseelyam (that of the Parabrahmam getting tied up by an unlettered cowherdess, and looking to her for liberation, with appealing eyes full of tears), that he fell unconscious for six months. Volumes have been and would still be written about navaneeta chouryam, and it is not for a humble soul like adiyen to add to the lore. Theft of milk and butter is hardly a matter for serious concern. Sri Satakopa Muni accuses Him of a much graver offence-that of stealing his soul- and warns others to beware of this Divine Thief. "Senchor kavigAl uyir kAtthu Atcheymin-TirumAl irum sOlai Vanjak kaLvan mAmAyan mAyakkaviyAi vandu- en Nenjum uyirum uL kalandu nindrAr ariyA vaNNam-en Nenjum uyirum avai undu tAnE Agi niraindAnE" And further, "neermayAl nenjam vanjitthu pugundu-ennai Eermai seidu en uyirAi en uyirundAn"etc. Emperuman was so enamoured of Azhwar that He could not bear his seperation, and though Azhwar did not invite Him, He stole Azhwar's body and soul and became one with him. Here, Azhwar asks Emperuman an embarrassing question- "I have been toiling in this samsAra for aeons, suffering through several cycles of births and deaths. And though I have been crying out to You repeatedly, You did not heed me and did little to grant me liberation. And, in this janmA, when I have done nothing to merit your attentions, You are invading me perforce and insist on taking me to SriVaikuntam (ViNNulagam taruvAnAi viraigindrAn). Pray, tell me the reason for this? ( "indru ennai poruLAkki tannai ennuL vaitthAn-andru ennai puram pOga puNartthadu en seyvAn"). Emperuman does not have a reply to this question, and stands silent before the Azhwar, with eyes downcast with shame .The beautiful sreesooktis of Sri Nampillai in the eedu and Swami Desikan's interpretations of this pasuram are indeed worthwhile perusing. Tempting as it is to dwell on these excellent panktis, adiyen would like to stick to the topic. Summing up the case against His Lordship, one would tend to agree with Azhwar that there is ample justification for branding Emperuman as a "KaLvan". However, we find that this thievery, instead of bringing Him disrepute, adds to His glory .His theft of butter, etc., and His getting punished for the same, highlight the glorious attribute of Souseelyam, while His stealing our bodies and souls is indicative of His insatiable hunger for ChEtana lAbham. This is a tale of two thieves: having seen the machinations of the Divine Thief, who do you think is the other thief? Please do not take offence if I say that we human beings collectively form the second class of thieves. Sri Kalian says, "KaLvan AnEn padiru seidiruppEn" , "vampulAm koondal manaiviyai turandu pirar poruL tAram endru ivattrai nambinAr" etc. Some of us covet the riches, women and other belongings of others, rendering us the worst sort of thieves, whether or not we actually carry out the thoughts of theft into action. As the saying goes, a true SriVaishnava always looks at others' wives as his own mother, others' riches as mere dust, and treats all other beings as he would be treated himself.("Matruvat para dArEshu, lOshtavat para dravyEshu, Atmavat sarva bhootEshu ya:pasyati sa pasyati"). Going back to Sri Parakalan, the theft attributed to him could be classified as sAtvic, as the proceeds, though ill-gotten, were utilized not for his personal benefit, but for tadeeyArAdhanam and for building temple towers and compounds. Swami Desikan justifies such unorthodox methods of fund-raising (as those resorted to by Sri Kalian) in his (now extinct)work, "StEyAvirOdham". However, the misdemeanours mentioned above pale into insignificance, when we consider the other type of theft all of us are guilty of-that of "AtmApahAram". By nature, the JeevAtma is the eternal slave of the Lord, and exists solely to be of some use to Him. "dAsa bhootAh:svata:sarvE hi AtmAna:paramAtmana:" says the MantrarAja pada stOtram. We all, our bodies and souls, are the undisputed property of Emperuman. However, the age-old shackles of ahankAram and MamakAram make us imagine that we are independent agents with our own belongings. We delude ourselves that we are responsible for our own well-being and that of others " dependent" on us. Sri Nammazhwar puts this state of mind succinctly thus-"YanE ennai ariagilAdE, YanE entanadE endru irundEn". Swami Desikan describes this as the worst possible form of theft, from several angles: 1.the value of the stolen item, viz., the Jeevatma, is beyond measure: 2. the person whose property is stolen is none less than the Almighty: 3.even after the Lord, in His infinite mercy, points out to us (through shastrAs and Acharyas) that we are indeed His property, we tend to dispute it (by saying "aham mE" when He claims "tvam ME"). Now, how do we get out of the mire of ahankArA and mamakArA? Swami Desikan comes to our rescue with an easy solution- return the stolen article to the rightful owner, with profound apologies. Since, in this case, the item stolen is the priceless jewel of jeevatma, we should surrender ourselves, in body and soul, to the Lord, with the conscious thought of returning to Him what is His by right. This calls for the realization,in Sri Nammazhwar's words, "yAnE nee, en udaimayum neeyE"(I am indeed Yours, and all that I consider mine is also Yours). Sri Alavandar puts this beautifully thus-"mama nAtha yadasti yOsmi aham, sakalam tat hi tavaiva Madhava". In other words, what is required is Atma SamarpaNam, through an Acharya. The Saranagati thus performed restores to the soul its lost quality of sEshatvam. While the gravity of the theft make us liable for maximum punishment, once we perform Prapatti, the Divine Mother intercedes on our behalf and ensures that we not only get off lightly, but also gain admittance to the world of eternal bliss, of uninterrupted kainkarya, to the Lord and His divine consort. Srimate Sri LakshmiNrsimha divya paduka sevaka SrivanSatakopa Sri Narayana Yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama: __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sridhar L: "Fw: Sri Sannidhi Acharya TN celebration (Sep 1 & 2)"
- Previous message: Srivatsa Kadambi: "Re: [srivenugopala] Re: Any Answer"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: A tale of two thieves"
- Reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: A tale of two thieves"
- Maybe reply: Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan: "Re: A tale of two thieves"
- Maybe reply: Sheela Belur: "Re: A tale of two thieves"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]