Re: 43rd Azhagiya Singar's dEha sambhandam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 22, 2001
Dear SrimAn Srikanth,
You wrote:
> And has there ever been an instance where one
> matam/ashramam has had a successor who
> orgininally belonged to the other matam/ashramam but took up
> the responsibility for preservation of our Dharmam!?
I believe that the 6th Jeeyar of the Ahobila Matham, shastha
paraankusha swaami was a munitraya aachaarya (before becoming a
Ahobila Matham sannyaasi). This is clear from the taniyan that
munitraya lineage people recite:
raamaanujam ananthaaryam taataachaarya paraankushau
^^^^^^^^^^^^
ahobilaachaarya mahaa-dayaadheesha guruuttamau
Knowledgeable members may verify this.
-aDiyEn muraLi kaDaambi
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: narayankv_at_yahoo.com: "TELE STOTHRAM & PRABANDHAM CLASSES THIS WEEK"
- Previous message: Srivatsa Kadambi: "Re: Any Answer"
- In reply to: Srikant Sadagopan: "43rd Azhagiya Singar's dEha sambhandam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]