Re: 43rd Azhagiya Singar's dEha sambhandam

Dear SrimAn Srikanth,

You wrote:
> And has there ever been an instance where one
> matam/ashramam has had a successor who
> orgininally belonged to the other matam/ashramam but took up 
> the responsibility for preservation of our Dharmam!?

I believe that the 6th Jeeyar of the Ahobila Matham, shastha 
paraankusha swaami was a munitraya aachaarya (before becoming a 
Ahobila Matham sannyaasi).  This is clear from the taniyan that 
munitraya lineage people recite:

raamaanujam ananthaaryam taataachaarya paraankushau
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^
ahobilaachaarya mahaa-dayaadheesha guruuttamau

Knowledgeable members may verify this.
-aDiyEn muraLi kaDaambi




--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

• Next message: narayankv_at_yahoo.com: "TELE STOTHRAM & PRABANDHAM CLASSES THIS WEEK"
• Previous message: Srivatsa Kadambi: "Re: Any Answer"
• In reply to: Srikant Sadagopan: "43rd Azhagiya Singar's dEha sambhandam"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]