Re: demigod worship
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 25, 2000
Sri Madhavakkannan wrote: > I am sorry, Sri Mani, if I have spelt out some rahasyam as I was not aware > of it. [...] Thanks very much, Sri Mani for > "thirutthi paNikOLLu"fying (correcting) adiyEn. Dear Sri Madhavan, Please don't apologize! I don't mean to say that rahasyas shouldn't be discussed at all, but that these subjects need to be approached with delicacy in a mixed audience. The idea of Emberumaan being a 'nAyaka' in the SRngAra-bhAva makes sense only to those who have surrendered to him; therein, I humbly feel, lies the rahasya. And I don't mean to correct you but to mediate between two honest opinions. With respect, dAsan, Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: M.G.Vasudevan: "kannanaik kanden"
- Previous message: Madhavakkannan V: "Re:demigod worship"
- Maybe in reply to: bhavani nirmal: "demigod worship"
- Next in thread: J. Venkatanathan: "Re: demigod worship"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]