Re: Digest Number 122
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 24, 2000
Hare Krishna Madhavakkannan Prabhu. Could you please elaborate more on the Markandeya pastime. Most of the time this point is not mentioned at all in books ! They only mention the pastime with Lord Shiva. Is this the same Markendeya Rishi who had the bhagyam to see the Lord on the aalilai during pralaya kaalam ? Your servant, R. Jai Simman ----- Original Message ----- From:To: Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 4:50 PM Subject: Digest Number 122 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - > To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com > Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > There are 2 messages in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. Re: demigod worship- query from Sri Badri > From: madhav.vasudevan@sg.abb.com > 2. Re: worshipping other deities > From: Mani Varadarajan > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:37:28 +0800 > From: madhav.vasudevan@sg.abb.com > Subject: Re: demigod worship- query from Sri Badri > > > > Sri: > Srimathe Gopaladesika mahadesikaya Namah: > > Dear Sri Badri, > > You had asked: > > Being born as Vaishnavas is it a sin worshipping > other Gods ,or is it just that we are not required to > worship other dieties.Is there any harm in worshipping > them as long as we realize Narayana is supreme.What > are we supposed to do when we go to temples which have > many dieties.Should we worship Perumal and > deliberately avoid other dieties? > > ==== > > You asked a very common query asked by all of us, one time or the other.This has > been discussed in great details in the list and can be found in archives. > > Being a SrI JayanthI day, on this auspcicious day, let us discuss at this, > thereby paying our obeisance to the Lord GeethAcharyan Sri KrishNA.- the > Primordial Chief, The Unparalleled, Unsurpassed Supreme, Sriya: Pathi Sriman > Narayanan. > > In GitA, Lord says: > > O son of Kunti! At the end of the Cosmic cycle, (during praLyam) all (- repeat > -ALL)- enter into My nature, and at the beginning of another cycle, by My free > will, and potency, I create them again. (I don't remember the actual slokam) > > THIS INCLUDES You, me- and all demi Gods, whom we worship like four faced > brahmA, Sivan, indran, agni et al. Veda says: sa brahmA; sa siva srEndhra > sOkshara: parama swaraat. He is BrahmA; Siva; Indran. They are also Jivans, like > us and by virtue of their karmAs, have reached that position. They are posts, > and jIvans keep changing at that post (like brahmA, Sivan are posts like General > Manager, Production manager.. whereas Sriman Narayanan is the Owner- He does NOT > change). > > Hence, WE ARE ALL HIS CHILDREN. HIS SERVANTS. No point in calling some demigod > as "appA", when we know who the Father is. > > Now answer for your query: > > We are His dAsans- His devotees, it is He and He alone, who is capable of > granting all that we seek, and pray. (In Gita, He says: whatever the demigods > can grant (to the extent of their powers) is also through Me (as the antharyami > in them). > > WHY ASK SOMEONE when we have the "ACTUAL TRUE GIVER" on our side? > > Now- why ask Him a kilo of vegetables, when he is willing to give His kingdom to > us? He will naturally feed us, take care of us. Ask Him the Big, Grand thing, > and get out of this samsaara saagaram. > > We SHOULD NOT GO TO THE temple, where the demi gods are consecrated, (along with > Sriman Narayanan) and are in abhayahastham. (showing their palms (as if they can > protect us!). Protect from what?- births and deaths.. for ever. It is HE alone - > who can do that. Thirumazhisai AzhwAr, when once was aksed by Sivan (pleased > with AzhwAr's meditation) as to what he seeks, AzhwAr said "You can not give > what I want- it is mOksham- liberation". MarkaNdEya Maharishi, who was saved by > Sivan (by the grace of Sriman Narayanan) from Yama dhUthAs, could not get > freedom from future briths from Sivan. > > IF AT ALL, we HAVE TO GO to the temple, we need to avoid those sannidhis. > > We "can" go if the demi gods are in folded hands (paying their obeisance to Lord > Sriman Narayanan) and then they become Bhagawathas. We can pay our obeisance to > Bhagawathas/devotees of Sriman Narayanan. > > THIS IS NOT JUST FOR THOSE WHO HAVE PERFORMED BHARANYASAM (SaraNAgathy) or > SAMASRAYANAM (pancha samskaram) It is not for Ramanuja's sishyas. Adhi Sankara, > Madhavcharya were also VishNu devotees. It is the difference in interpretations, > they differed from Ramanuja. Not on the Supreme Lord. All vaidikAs are vishNu > bhakthAs. This is the case for all vaishnavas. For all those who belive in > Vedas- For all those who belive in "Hinduism". If someone has a different > opinion, either he does not know or he is not willing to know. > > You may say- after samasrayanam, or baraNyAsam, I will avoid demigod worship.- > not now. It is as if, you can let your daughter have 'n' number of boy friends- > (especially when she knows or you, as "the Father" of the daughter, know the > ACTUAL GROOM HIMSELF). You may say, " I have some picture in my perumAL > sannidhi. How can I throw?" No need to throw. Give ot to them (who still do not > believe Vedas in true sense, and) who worship demi gods. Call them- invite them > at your home and give as gift. Do not hide in your sannidhi. That is like hiding > a boy friend's picture after wedding to Sriman Narayanan. > > Let us pray at the Lotus Feet of KaNNAN. "maNNum viNNum ellaam uNda num KANNAN > kaNNalladhu maRRaiyOr kaNNO?" > > Regards > > Narayana Narayana > adiyEn Narayana Dasan Madhavakkannan > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:39:12 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mani Varadarajan > Subject: Re: worshipping other deities > > > Badri wrote: > > 1) Being born as Vaishnavas is it a sin worshipping > > other Gods ,or is it just that we are not required to > > worship other dieties.Is there any harm in worshipping > > them as long as we realize Narayana is supreme.What > > are we supposed to do when we go to temples which have > > many dieties.Should we worship Perumal and > > deliberately avoid other dieties? > > Dear Badri, > > Let me offer an alternate point of view. > > It depends on your state of mind. If you have absolute > faith in the purifying grace of Narayana, your mind by > itself will develop an aversion to worshipping anything > short of this Ultimate. If you settle for worshipping > anything other than the Ultimate, it only demonstrates > lack of faith and lack of resolve in attaining the > highest good. Our acharyas emphatically emphasize that > we should not settle for any of these lesser goals, > and that we must wholeheartedly and single-mindedly > dedicate ourself only to the highest, Narayana. > > It is not a "sin" to worship other gods, in that you > are not a morally bad person for doing so. It is not > morally wrong like slaughtering a living being or partaking > in such slaughter's fruits. It is, however, detrimental > if you have resolved to focus yourself on the Ultimate, > because you are falling far short of your goal, and you > are not being honest with yourself. Rather than > recognizing your inherent, true nature as a 'sesha' of > Narayana, you are being enslaved by other things, whether > they be sensual pleasures, wealth, or other deities. > Worship of all these other things are not conducive > to the highest spiritual good, because there is no > meeting point between them and your essential nature. > > If you choose to worship anything other than the our > Blissful Beloved Narayana, you must ask yourself why > you are doing so. If you really do not care for attaining > the highest good in the most direct manner, go ahead and > do as you are doing. But if you are really resolved > to attain nothing other than Narayana, there is nothing > that anything or anyone else can give that will satisfy > you. So, the bottom line is that you must stay focussed. > > But even here, it is important to understand that not > all people are mentally ready to take the plunge into the > blissful waters of Narayana. As Nammalvar says, > "avar avar tamatamadu arivari vagai vagai..." -- people > worship their gods according to their inclination and > capacity to grasp the truth. What's more, such gods > themselves are not "false" -- "avar avar iraiyavar > kuRaivilar" -- because even within these gods, our Narayana > stands within and is the power that bestows whatever benefits > they may confer. > > Many such people are simply not ready to become 'ekAntis', > i.e., single-minded in their devotion to Narayana. Perhaps > this is because of their family background or the place they > live; we cannot say. For many such people, worshipping other > divinities is a necessary step for their mind to become slowly > purified, to cross over their mundane desires and realize that > the essential truth of Narayana. We should be careful not > to condemn these people, since their mental outlook is not > conducive to exclusive worship of Narayana. Let them be, > for that is currently the appropriate path for them. Their > worship will slowly purify their mind and eventually it too > will be directed toward Narayana. Yes, it is slower than > the direct path, but this is not our worry. > > You also ask a more practical question which face many of us. > If you go to a temple with many deities, I have been taught > that respect should be given to all, but worship and adoration > is only to Narayana and his parivAras. There is nothing wrong > in avoiding the other sannidhis. But when confronted by the > other deities installed, we must be respectful. For example, when > walking down the street, if all of a sudden we come across > an utsavam of Siva Perumaan, we are to respectfully > hold our hands together, and let the utsavam pass on our > right side. By no means should we do anything disrespectful. > > Furthermore, we shouldn't apply our rules and our philosophy > to members of other traditions. The way Advaita has evolved, > for example, they worship Siva, Vishnu, Ganapati, Parvati, etc., > equally. No matter how wrong we think they are, let them be, is > my opinion. That is the way their acharyas have taught them > for at least a thousand years. Our only quarrel with them > should be if they challenge us. > > aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, > Mani > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Praveena & Anand: "Fruits of Action"
- Previous message: subhasri01_at_hotmail.com: "cosmic creation"
- Next in thread: Shuba : "Re: Digest Number 122"
- Maybe reply: Shuba : "Re: Digest Number 122"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]