Part 8-Experiencing Bhagavat Ramanuja Yatiraja's Divine Works
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 9, 2000
===================================================================== Part 8 - Experiencing Bhagavat Ramanuja Yatiraja's Divine Works ===================================================================== In Vedartha Sangraha, it was established that the Brahman is Akila Heya PratyanIka: ananta KalyaNa GuNa visishta: Purushoththama: After ascertaining the meaning of the verse "Tat Tvam Asi", Shree Bhagavath Ramanuja Yatiraja proceeds to explain that the concept of "Nirvisesha Vastu" is totally against the PramANam. The sruthi verse "Satyam JgnyAnam anantam" is considered now. Let us now examine how Advaita and Visishtadvaita have told the meaning of the verse. If one examines both the philosophies in this context, it will be easier to comprehend and ascertain the meaning of this verse. To understand the unparalleled and unsurpassed greatness of the words of our Shree VaishNava AchAryas, their own words stands as proof in this regard. The experience that a student gets on reading the divine works of Bhagavath Ramanuja cannot be got from some other person's BhAshya on the PrastAna Trayam. That is why, after experiencing the srI-sOktIs (divine words) of our Bhagavath Ramanuja Yatiraja, Swamy Shreeman NigamAntha Maha Desika said "yathi pravara bhArathI rasabharENa nItham vaya:". Swamy Desika says that he spent his lifetime by enjoying the divine words of Bhagavath Ramanuja Yatiraja. We continue with the subject of discussion "Satyam JgnyAnam anantam" sruthi verse. The interpretation given by Advaita and the purport ascertained by Visishtadvaita are considered now. "Sarva prathyanIkAkArathA bOdhnEapi tath-tath prathyanIkA kArathAyAm bhEdasya avarjanIyathvAnna nirviseshathva siddhi:" Let us first see what Visishtadvaita has to say regarding this as follows: The verses of Veda like "yathO vA ImAni bhUtAni jAyantEÂ…" are kAraNa vAkyas stating Brahman as the only cause of the universe. The verses of Veda like "satyam jgnyAnam anantam" are sodaka vAkyAs explaining the infinite divine/auspicious qualities of Brahman - the nature of Brahman is well explained by these verses. That is, "satyam jgnyAnam anantam" states that the Brahman is having satyatva-jgnyAnatva-& anantatvams - meaning the Brahma-swarOpam is having qualities namely eternal-unchanging-existence, sentient & being infinite. The nature of quality (attribute) is that it differentiates the entity (substance) which is attributed/qualified by them from other entities. For example, when we say "red flower", the "red (redness)" is the quality/attribute and "flower" is that which is qualified/attributed. This "red" differentiates that flower possessing red colour from other flowers like "blue flower", "yellow flower" etc.,. In the same manner, the verse "satyam jgnyAnam anantam" explains the Brahman as having certain qualities and thus differentiates Brahman from all chit and achit entities. Let us examine this in detail as follows. "Satyam" - states that the Brahman is characterised by "eternal unchanging real existence". The Brahman is declared as the only cause of the universe by the kAraNa vAkyAs. But we find the "cause" like raw gold, wood etc., to undergo changes to become "effect" like ornaments, furniture etc in the hands of the instrumental cause. Now a doubt may arise here - "If the Brahman is called as the cause of the universe, then is it a changing entity? Also is there anyone who has Brahman's nature under his control?" To clarify this doubt and answer the questions, the Satya padam (padam-word) states that the Brahman's nature of existence is eternal, real and not under the control of anything (nirupAdikam) natural to itself and is unchanging. This Satya padam differentiates the Brahman from the achit and Karma-badhda-chit entities. All the achit entities are having their swarOpa-sthithi-pravruti under the full control of Brahman. All the achit entities undergo changes. The karma-baddha-chit (badhda jIvAtmans) entities are having their swarOpa-sthithi-pravruti under the full control of Brahman. The status of karma-baddha-chit (badhda jIvAtmans) entities, the changes in their bodies are under the control (sankalpam) of Brahman. Therefore the Satya padam clearly establishes that the Brahman is different from achit (all its three types namely triguNya(misra-satva), satva-sUnya(kAlam), sudhda-satva(aprAkrutam)) and baddha-jIvAtman entities. Next we consider the jgnyAna padam. This states that the Brahma swarOpam is sentient swarOpam and the Brahman has jgnyAna (knowledge-to know) as its essential attribute. All the AatmAs (jIvAtmans and the ParamAtman-Brahman) have jgnyAna swarOpam. Also all the AatmAs have knowledge (dharma-bhUtha jgnyAna) to know other things. To differentiate the Brahman (ParamAtman) from all muktha-jIvAtmans (liberated jIvAtmans) the Veda uses the jgnyAna padam. That is, it states that the Brahman has nitya-asankuchita jgnyAna - meaning the Brahman has (infinite) jgnyAna eternally without any contractions to it.. On the other hand, let us consider the muktha-jIvAtman. He was previously (before attaining mukthi) in the samsAra bound by his own karma (which has no beginning - anAdi karma) and therefore had prAkruta-triguNya-sarIram. When he was in samsAra, his jgnyAna has contracted as per his own karma. Therefore the muktha-jIvAtman had contracted jgnyAna when they were as badhdha-jIvAtman with prakruti-sambandam. They got their jgnyAna expanded fully only on attaining mukthi after getting their prakruti-sambandam fully removed. This is not the case with Brahman. Therefore the jgnyAna padam clearly states that the Brahman is different from the muktha-jIvAtmans. Let us now consider the "ananta" padam. anantam means infinite - beyond all parameters (measures) like dEsa (length, place), kAla (time) and vasthu (physical mass). These three measures (limits) are called "parichchedam". The Brahman is present everywhere. Therefore dEsa parichchedam is not applicable for Brahman. That is limiting the Brahman to a "length" "place" is not possible. The Brahman is present eternally - always. Therefore kAla parichchedam is not applicable for Brahman. That is limiting the Brahman to a "time" is not possible. Also the Brahman has ubhaya-vibhUthi (all chit and achit entities) as its body. Therefore vasthu parichchedam is not applicable for Brahman. That is limiting the Brahman to a "vasthu" is not possible. On the other hand, let us consider the nitya-jIvAtmans (nitya-sUris). Though the nitya sUris (like Garuda, Adi-sesha, vishvaksena etc.,) are eternally without karma (hence eternally without prakruti-sambandam), eternally are with full knowledge, they are having these parichchedams. But the Brahman is not having the parichchedams. Therefore the "ananta" padam states that the Brahman is different from Nitya sUris (nitya-jIvAtmans) also. Thus the Veda concludes that the Brahman is different from all the achit and chit entities by stating the unique characteristics/attributes the Brahman has by stating "satyam jgnyAnam anantam brahma". Veda tells the unparalleled and unsurpassed greatness of Brahman here. Brahman is Purushoththama:. If someone still advocates "nirvisEsha chin mAtram brahma", then "nirvisEsha chin mAtram brahma" is not appropriate to be told before scholars who have studied properly in detail the Veda-Vedanta, Gita and Brahma Sutras. Even a layman will not consider "nirvisesha chin mAtram brahma" as it is contradicting even simple logic. In this context the verse of Bhagavath Gita (which will be explained after few postings when we take up SrI Gita bhAshya of Bhagavath Ramananuja) are given below with an outline of meaning to substantiate the above words. Before giving the slokas of Bhagavath Gita, Bhagavath Ramanuja in his commentary (SrI Gita BhAshya) says "atha: maththa Eva sarva vEdAnAm sArabhUtham artham sruNu" meaning - BhagavAn Shree Krishna ParamAtman addressed Arjuna and said, "Therefore, listen from Me alone the meaning which is the essence of all the Vedas" In the Purushoththama Yogam (15th chapter of Bhagavath Gita), BhagavAn Shree Krishna ParamAtman (SrIman nArAyaNa:) said - dvAvimow purushow lOkE ksharaschAkshara Eva cha | kshara: sarvANi bhUthAni kUtasthOakshara uchyathE || The types of jIvAtmans is told here Uththama: purushasthvanya: paramAthmEthudAhrutha: | yO lokatrayamAvishya bibharthyavyaya Iswara: || The ParamAtma is told here who is different from all chit and achit entities. yasmAthksharamatIthOhamaksharAdapi chOththama: | athOasmi lokE vEdE cha prathitha: PURUSHOTHTHAMA: || Veda and Smruthies confirm that the God (ParamAtma) is Purushoththama: SrIman nArAyaNa: VishNu: vAsudeva: (satyam jgnyAnam anantam brahma) yO mAmEvamasammUDO jAnAthi purushOththamam | sa sarvavidbhajathi mAm sarvabhAvEna bhAratha || He who understands clearly that the one and only God is Purushoththama: SrIman nArAyaNa:, knows everything. ithi guhyatamam sAstramidamuktham mayAnagha | EthadbudhvA buddhimAnsyAthkruthakruthyascha BhAratha || He who knows this secret of Purushoththama: which is the essence of vEda, becomes truly wise. The Brahma sUtras confirm the same purport. The four important errors in Advaita's philosophy as far as Advaita interpreting "tat tvam asi" verse is concerned are 1. The Sruthi telling infinite divine qualities of Brahman (tat) gets contradicted. 2. There is a need to tell "lakshaNa" (a technical concept) unnecessarily for "tat" and "tvam". 3. SAmAnAdhikaraNyam gets violated 4. Upakrama VirOdham arises. This was mentioned in the previous posting itself. The first point (out of the given four points above) is considered and that is why the explanation for "satyam jgnyAnam anantam" was written. Let us now see the meaning of "satyam jgnyAnam anantam" as told by Advaita and then understand that "The Sruthi telling infinite divine qualities of Brahman (tat) gets contradicted" and Advaita's interpretation is against Veda and is erroneous. ===================================================================== To be continued.. . ===================================================================== Thanks & Regards M.S.HARI Ramanuja Daasan. ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 --------------------------------------------------------------------http://click.egroups.com/1/6347/5/_/716111/_/965831527/ --------------------------------------------------------------------|e>- -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Padhuka Sahasram-279"
- Previous message: Madhavakkannan V: "Re: Need to know"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]