Re: Vadakalai and Tenkalai and other questions
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 15, 1999
Sugantha Jagannthan wrote: > respected sir I would like to know when the > iyengar sect got split into vadagali and > tengalai.What is the major difference betweenthe > two other than the thiruman.I would also like to > know about the history and the hereditery of > iyengars fromsrimathy For the sake of Srimathy and all other newcomers to this forum, I thought that I would share a brief layman's synopsis of this complex discussion. I would suggest that those wanting more details to please check the archives of Bhakti for postings from more erudite members of this group. First of all, the term "Iyengar" really does not refer to a religious sect at all, but rather to a subset of Brahmins who, by tradition, are heriditary heirs to the religion of SriVaishnavam. While the Iyengar Community is most certainly directly linked to this religion, SriVaishnavam is, in its essence, completely independent of the idea of caste, and has followers hailing from all communities. And, with increasing awarenes in the west, I am happy to say, has started to include all races as well. So, when we speak of such things as Vadakalai or Tenkalai, we should note that these belong to SriVaishnavam as as a religion, and not to Iyengars as a caste. And, we must also be very careful to not consider the two terms (SriVaishnava and Iyengar) as being interchangable. However, with regards to Iyengars in particular, we can probably surmise that all of them can trace their ancestral roots or disciplic succession (paramparai) back to the foremost achAryan of our tradition, Sri Ramanuja, or one of his disciples. The formal division of the tradition into the two schools of thought known as Vadakalai or Tenkalai seems to have a fairly recent history, but it seems that scholars cannot really agree as to specifically when references to SriVaishnavam as having two schools became established. However the philosophical differences that have created this division can generally be traced back to two 14th century philosophers, Swamy Vedanta Desika (reputed to be the founder of the Vadakalai view), and Swamy Pillai Lokacharyar (who, along with Sri Manavalamamunigal, is reputed to be the founder of the Tenkalai view). Officially, there are 18 fundamental differences between the two schools of thought (not including the shape of the thiruman). But, the one difference that is perhaps most significant is how the two schools interpret prapatti/saranAgathi, the Path of Self-Surrender to the Lord. Of crucial concern are: what constitutes prapatti, what are the qualifications for performing prapatti, and whether or not prapatti necessitates a formal act on the part of the individual. The details of these issues are rather complex, and indeed are only meant to be taught by scholars. So, I will not attempt to address these further. While it cannot be denied that the kalai differences form a big part of SriVaishnava discussion and debate, I feel that it is important to note that most AchAryans, and many lay followers, see these differences as being relatively unimportant in comparison to the spirit of devotion to Sriman Narayana and dedication to Ramanuja's Vision (emperumAnAr darshanam) that all SriVaishnavas share. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, Mohan
- Next message: Sugantha Jagannthan: "udayavar sannidhi"
- Previous message: muralidhar rangaswamy: "Re:Tirumangai Azhwar's Pasurams 2.8"
- In reply to: Sugantha Jagannthan: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]