Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 30, 1997
There are many points that Krishna K. brought up that need to be addressed. I will try to do so in a note sometime over the next few days. At the outset, however, I ask that the Bhakti members be a little more careful in their style of writing, especially when responding to the first article of a new member, such as our new acquaintance Sri Sundara Rajan. It is important that no one be scared away from posting their views, and it is especially important that we be sensitive about this when it comes to new members. I am sure Krishna Prasad meant only well and was inspired by thoughts of his understanding of SaraNAgati, but articles with sentences in all CAPITALS generally come across poorly. It often looks like the author is shouting when he merely wishes to be strident. Regarding the content of Krishna's article itself, I believe there are several misconceptions about our pUrvAcAryas' views of the Alvars as well as the variety of views on the nature of self-surrender. I believe Krishna's views are based on a slightly mistaken understanding of Sri Vedanta Desika's works, as well as a misreading of the views of Pillai Lokacarya and Manavala MaamunigaL. I will address these in a longer article in a day or two. Mani
- Next message: Kalyani Krishnamachari: "ANANDA RAMAYANAM - IV"
- Previous message: M K Sudarshan: "The 4th Widow of AyodhyA-Part 3 of 8"
- Maybe in reply to: usdeiva: "Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]