Re: Some Reflections
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 15, 1996
I think Swami Desikan's nyaasa thilakam (I posted the first few verses) clearly explains this. It is enough even you surrender once, even if such a prapannaa errs, HE will put them on the corrective path and take them to mOksham. In this slOkam swami desikan explains the two maargams for getting mOksham and explains how simple is surrender or saraNaagathi. when I have heard advaithins say that "saraNaagathi is only a means and not the end", I would like to point out that "knowledge whether so called absolute or partial is only a vehicle and not the final destination by itself. Even the knowledge that it itself is free from anyaanaa and is itself is ablsoulute and is itlsef is the final destination is only a partial knowledge and not the final destination. It is partial knowledge becuase no one can completely either talk or describe Lord and his kalyaana gunangal and until such complete knowledge on The Lord's is known no knowledge is complete (SRimath Bagwath Geetha) and only the LORD in HIS true form can have such complete knowledge on HIM. Hence all the other so called knowledge is only partial and cannot be considered complete to clear the so called anyaanaa. As said by our poorvaachaaryaaL, this so called absolute knowledge needs to be an object for this only one real soul to realise that it is the only one real soul, and that once there is one soul and an object is in this process, it is neither absolute nor void of attributes, though one may claim that after this process only this absoulteness is achieved. It is becuase of the irony that this process will even make the very "vedams" with which all the souls thrive as false at the end due to its absoluteness. Hence such process that destroys their own foundation (by saying that this absoluteness is the only real and that even void of vedams) and would render the vedams as false is considered non saathvik by our achaaryaals. In short, even as per the process of our counterparts the highest possible knowledge (for us the "unreal" perceivers) is only a vehicle and need not be considered as most important for mOksham except that one must know the knowledge on surrender. Our nammaazhwaar says on the paasuram for Lord Oppilaippan that our Lord is in the form of both the opposites moodam and nyaanam 3367: nagaramum naatugaLum "NYaanamum mootamumaay", nigarilsoozh sudaraayiru LaaynNila Nnaayvisumpaay, sigaramaa tangaLsoozh thiruviNNagarch chErndhapiraan, pugargoL keerththiyallaalillai yaavarkkum puNNiyamE. 6.3.3 Thiruvaaymozhi Since our Lord is also present in (as in above "NYaanamum mootamumaay") "moodam", one need not worry about acquiring only enormous knowledge to either know or qualify for mOksham. Hence one need not worry about mastering the knowldege but simply get such knowledge to surrender to the Lord is sufficient. nammaazhwaar thiruvadikaLE saraNam Swami Desikan thiruvadikaLE saraNam Sri BoomaDevi samEthara Sri Oppiliappan thiruvadikaLE saraNam Sampath Rengarajan
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Guidelines for posting to the Bhakti list"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "A Dialogue on Hinduism - General"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]