re: some thought on "parasurama"
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 5, 1995
In Sam rengi's article is included this following paragraph : > This is anoter classical example that no one > is exceptional to the Karmic cycle, and Bakthi yoga can relieve one from the > adverse reaction due to one's bad karma's. I invite some comments and am >interested in knowing any other such karmic references of HIS Avathaarams. This is against the principles of visistadvaita. and such references which sam rengi has quoted are typical examples of a major flaw of deriving philosophical tenets from puranas. According to visistadvaita and even other systems to some extent, Srimannarayana is exempt from all karmas even in his avataras. He is not bound as we are. The concept of avatar has to be very seriously studied (atleast some 10 hrs of reading different shastras!) before getting into conclusions. Avatar is a human or animal incarnation which is done for some purposes - "punishing of wicked" and "protection of the pious", for instance. During these avatars normal conclusions should not be resorted to. All philosophical doctrines should be derived from "prasthana traya" only. ie. bhagavadgita, bramhasutras and vedas. NOte that Naalayira divya prabandham, though considered as on par with vedas cannot stand as a valid testimony in any inter scholastic debate. But, since naalayira divya prabandhams are divine experiences of alwars, they have been found to corroborate vedic truths on the basis of experiential evidence, and hence openly embraced by visistadvaita system. Thus visistadvaita system is known as "ubhaya vedanta" or two-fold vedanta. First of all durga purana is not in the list of satvic puranas as enumerated by veda vyasa in mahabharatha. So conclusions should not be done from them. The satvic puranas are to a large extent taken as authority. Please see vedartha sangraha of ramanuja for details. But the bottom line is do not conclude vedantic details from puranic evidence. similar pranks are done by several people in fighting about siva-narayana issues quoting from puranas and even upanishads which are not taken as valid by any vedantin - dvaita, visistadvaita or advaita. Krishna ----- Begin Included Message ----- >From RENGI@VAX2.CONCORDIA.CA Wed Apr 5 13:45:37 1995 From: RENGI@VAX2.CONCORDIA.CA Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 09:26:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: some thought on "Parusu Rama" Avataaram To: prapatti@srirangam.esd.sgi.com X-Vms-To: IN%"prapatti@srirangam.esd.sgi.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Length: 1432 I read the classical reference by Mr.Dileepan on this avathaaram, from 4000. I have not read the Sriman Naaraayanaa puraanam in complete. But my mind goes after certain classified information on meditation and references to such in each puraana I read. In Durga puraanam, it is mentioned that Lord "Parasu Raman",tough being an Avathaar of "aathimoolam" has to worship Durga for for certain relief. ie After accomplishing his mission destroying shathriyaas all over, he felt that he still was followed by the cures "Maatru Banga Betham". ie He hacked his mother as perhis father's advise but then got her own life back as a boon from his father. The action of hacking his own "life giver" was not nullified by the getting back the life. ie Even the Lord was bound by that Karma or that "action-reaction cycle" and so he sought the blessings of "Kanaka Durgha" (HER temple is in AP) by doing a severe penenance for years and finally got her blessings and was relieved from his "Karma" on "Maatru Beda bangam". This is anoter classical example that no one is exceptional to the Karmic cycle, and Bakthi yoga can relieve one from the adverse reaction due to one's bad karma's. I invite some comments and am interested in knowing any other such karmic references of HIS Avathaarams. Sorry for some typos, my key board is old and I typed it on line. I shall type and proof read nextg time. Bear with me Sam Rengi ----- End Included Message -----
- Next message: Narayanan, Neera J: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: RENGI_at_VAX2.CONCORDIA.CA: "some thought on "Parusu Rama" Avataaram"
- Next in thread: Krishna Kalale: "re: some thought on "parasurama""
- Maybe reply: Krishna Kalale: "re: some thought on "parasurama""
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "re: some thought on "parasurama""
- Maybe reply: Krishna Kalale: "re: some thought on "parasurama""
- Maybe reply: Krishna Kalale: "re: some thought on "parasurama""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]