Re: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG

>While I agree with your overall observation, can you point out
>where Ramanuja says this about jnAna-yoga?  As I have understood
>the bhAshya, Ramanuja only says that success in jnAna-yoga is
>difficult and only possible for a very advanced aspirant, but it
>is nonetheless possible.

You are quite right that this is the overall tenor of Ramanuja's teaching;
the argument about jnanayoga not being for embodied (prakriti-samsrishta)
beings is an extreme example. I brought it up only to illustrate a point.
It occurs in Ramanuja's bhashya on BhG 3.35.

Ramanuja Dasa,
MG





--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

• Next message: h g a: "(unknown)"
• Previous message: Martin Gansten: "Exegesis and eisegesis"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin Gansten: "'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
• Next in thread: bindinganavale suresh: "Re: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]