Hamsa Sandesham and Megha Sandesham
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 8, 2001
sri: srimathe ramanujaya namaha: Dear Bhaktas, I have a small doubt, which is not exactly on the topic of Visisthadvaitam, but more so in Samskrutham. I understand that Megha Sandesham of Mahakavi Kaalidasa was rather "infulenced by Hamsa Sandesham", this would mean that kaalidasa would have been a figure somewhere in the 5th - 6th Centuries CE. This is not the traditional date ascribed to kaalidasa? Any comments on this topic? Regards, Daasan Malolan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Re: Sri GuNa Rathna Kosam : Part XXXIII: SlOkam 23"
- Previous message: Kalyani Krishnamachari: "nAcciyAr tirumozhi XII maRRu irundIrgaTku 6"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Hamsa Sandesham and Megha Sandesham"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Hamsa Sandesham and Megha Sandesham"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]