PramAnas for Brahman as being different from its Body
From the Bhakti List Archives
Anand Karalapakkam • Fri Apr 28 2000 - 11:56:43 PDT
SrI:
SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha
SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN SatakOpa -
SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha
Dear devotees,
namO nArAyaNa.
In the book "Philosophy and Theistic Mysticism of Alvars" by
SrI SMS Chari, he quotes two pramAnas to the effect that
Brahman as a metaphysical entity is different from its divine
body (pg 90, on Divine Personality, in the Doctrine of God).
They are reproduced here.
Saatvata Samhita, Poushkara Samhita and JayAkya Samhita are
regarded as the "Ratna Traya" (Three Jewels) in pAncAratra.
Saatvata Samhita (2.69-70) states
" SAntaha samvit-svarUpastu bhaktAnugraha-kAmyayA
anaupamyEna vapushAhy-amUrtO mUrtatAm gataha "
ie. " The Ultimate Reality is devoid of a form (amUrta), but it
assumes a limited form (mUrtatA) for the sake of devotees
and this limited form is incomparable (anupama) ".
This implies that the divyAtma svaroopa (ds) of Brahman is not
made up of a form, similar to how a jIvAtma's svaroopa doesn't
have any form. But, Brahman takes a form for the pleasure of
His devotees. Also, the divine body assumed by SrIman nArAyaNa
at SrI VaikUNTham is eternal and anAdi. Hence Brahman
certainly has a divine body eternally.
Another quote is from the JitantE Stotram, a khila sUkta of
Rg vEda :
" na tE rUpam na ca aakArO na-aayudhAni na ca-aaspadam |
tathApi purusha-AkArO bhaktAnAm tvam prakASasE || "
" You donot have any physical qualities such as white or
black (rUpa) ; You do not possess any physical organs
such as head or legs (aakAra) ; nor are there any weapons or
ornaments on You < in ds> (aayudha) ; nor do You have an
abode ; Neverthless out of
Your infinite compassion towards devotees , You manifest
Yourself with a lusturous bodily form bedecked with ornaments
and weapons in an abode of Yours < Be it arcAvatAra, vibhava
avatAra etc>".
note : This has been explained very well by SrI PuttankOttakam
SrInivAsAchArya swAmi ( a great scholar of the last
century and well known contemporary of 42nd HH Jeeyar
of Ahobila Mutt viz. SrImad InjimEttu Azhagiyasingar ),
in his commentary. SrI SMS Chari has followed his
explanations.
There are many more pramAnas in pAncarAtra on this issue.
I will later quote the section from SrI VishNu purANam which
explains as to how the bhakti yOgi (upAsaka) in his matured final
stages of upAsana is able to meditate on the divyAtma swaroopam
of Brahman, with its characteristics as Satyatvam, jn~yAnatvam
etc, without the divine body.
For time being, please also refer to SrI BhAshyam on adhikaraNAs
like AntaradhikaraNa (1.1.21),SarvatraprasiddhyadhikaraNa (1.2.7),
AdruSyatvadhikaraNa (1.2.23-24), VaishwAnara-adhikaraNa
(1.2.30-31), Dahara-adhikaraNa (1.3.20), PramitadhikaraNa (1.3.24),
........and Ubhayalinga adhikaraNa (3.2.11+). This will give a
good picture on the distinction between Brahman and its form, the
need of the form taken by Brahman being for the purpose of
meditation by bhakti yOgis (upAsakas) etc.
---------------------
I will soon post couple of verses from HarivamSa regarding the
VishNu/KrishNa issue. I will come back to these issues after few
months. I will switch over to other priorities for now esp. the
UttamUr SwAmi's Books Publication project. Thanks for your
understanding.
adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan,
anantapadmanAbhan,
KrishNArpaNam.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get paid for the stuff you know!
Get answers for the stuff you don’t. And get $10 to spend on the site!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2200/2/_/716111/_/956950648/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Re: Small Doubt on DashavatAra."
- Previous message: bindinganavale suresh: "re:question on nitya suris"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: PramAnas for Brahman as being different from its Body"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: PramAnas for Brahman as being different from its Body"
- Reply: S. HariKrishna: "Re: PramAnas for Brahman as being different from its Body"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
