RE: Krishna/Vishnu in Bhagavatam
From the Bhakti List Archives
R.Rajiv • Mon Apr 24 2000 - 22:04:16 PDT
> Dear Krishna Kalale,
>
> >I don't think Madhvas and SMarthas accept the GV view regarding Krishna /
> >Vishnu avatar issue.
>
> You are right, they don't; that's what I wanted to make clear. Sorry if I
> didn't express myself clearly. To the best of my knowledge, *only* GV's
> hold the Krishna form to be ontologically prior to Vishnu. Everyone else --
> Vaishnavas and Smartas alike -- holds the opposite.
Recently I had the oppurtunity to read Dr.B.N.K Sharma's book ( a
Dvaitin ) The philosophy of Madhvacharya... there he clearly says that
Krishna's form is eternal... So, I am not very sure how that
"ontologically prior " is to be understood here!!! I believe this is to
be understood as: Krishna's form was eternally present and it was made
visible by Him only during Dvapara yuga . Krishna is considered "
Purnavathara " in Madhva Philosophy.
With best regards,
rajiv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:
http://click.egroups.com/1/3555/2/_/716111/_/956683521/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: T.R. Govindarajan: "Acharya Sri. Ramanuja Jayanthi celebrations in New Jersey"
- Previous message: Martin Gansten: "Re: Krishna/Vishnu in Bhagavatam"
- In reply to: Martin Gansten: "RE: Krishna/Vishnu in Bhagavatam"
- Next in thread: Martin Gansten: "RE: Krishna/Vishnu in Bhagavatam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
