Re: A Question
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 19, 2000
SrI: SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN SatakOpa - SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha Dear SrI Anand VAsudEvan, namO nArAyaNa. Please go through the article Re: Mutual Exclusion 1 in the July 1999 archives : http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/jul99/0120.html This will be an additional information to that of SrI Hari's short and crisp answer. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, anantapadmanAbhan. Anand Vasudevan wrote: > Dear Sri bhagavatas, > In his reply, to sri L.Kumar,Sri A.Bharat has said that The simple > answer is that-both have GnAna as > swarUpa as well as quality;except that for Brahma both are infinite,whereas > for Atman(in his free state) only the quality is infinite. > he has quoted emperumanar for the above. but emperumanar has said in one of > his works that emperuman is nirguna brahmam. doesnt the above contradict? > can somebody explain this? > Regards, > Anand. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get paid for the stuff you know! Get answers for the stuff you donÂ’t. And get $10 to spend on the site! http://click.egroups.com/1/2200/2/_/716111/_/956162672/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Anand Karalapakkam: "krushNAstu bhagavAn swayam"
- Previous message: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: Sri Bhashyakarar and Sri Vishnupuranam etc"
- In reply to: Anand Vasudevan: "RE: A Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]