Search:
Bhakti List Archives

Reformatted: Re: Dreams as explained by discussion on pramanas

From the Bhakti List Archives

Chandrasekaran Venkatraman • April 17, 2000 


Dear Sri Venkat,
   Sorry. My first mail had really long lines. So resending after reformatting.

-----------------
   I was away from my mails for the past 3 days. So please bear with me this
 delay.
   Please don't misunderstand that I am talking for/against a school of philosophy
 in this mail. Basically I am trying to resolve my doubts.

   I agree that without cognition, fear won't arise. This is because if the person     
seeing the rope didn't have the cognition, he won't get the illusion of snake in 
the first place. For example a child won't experience fear upon seeing rope-snake.
   What I feel is cognition plays only a role of a medium of understanding in an 
experience and not a role of a cause because without cognition there is no talk
about experience itself. It's only a medium and it should be there. And it's true 
that there is no cognition without external objects (real and unreal). The 
question here is about the external objects that give rise to this cognition and 
not about the cognition itself which happens internal to a being. I hope I am 
clear here. 
   You said that "cognition is real and hence only real objects can cause real
experience". This is a partial statement.
   I feel here you are generalising by using the term "real objects" which in this 
case means only cognition which is internal. But how does this go to prove that 
illusory objects can't give rise to cognition ? Cognition can't arise by itself. 
There has to be a rope-snake to cause cognition of false-snake to arise.
   So I feel by dealing with the rope-snake case, you only proved that cognition 
causes real experience. That cognition is real needed no discussion. The question 
remains as to whether unreal external objects can give rise to cognition. If 
answer is yes, then "unreal objects can give rise to cognition and hence real 
experience".

   In summary, cognition is only internal medium of understanding in an experience 
and without that there is no talk about experience itself. So describing that as 
the cause will limit the scope of the discussion and will not answer the actual 
question. The "rope-snake" case is a question about external objects. So the 
problem is whether an unreal external object can give rise to cognition and hence 
real experience or not.

   Looking forward to your clarification on above notes.

   Members, please don't misunderstand that I am explicitly talking for any school 
of thoughts or against any default authorities of this list. This is purely self-
educative. 

   Thanks and regards,
   adiyEn,
   chandrasekaran.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get paid for the stuff you know!
Get answers for the stuff you donÂ’t. And get $10 to spend on the site!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2200/2/_/716111/_/955972320/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information