tenkalai/vadakalai
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 26, 1994
Thengalai/Vadagalai: about some historical settings related to the concepts as heard from elders. Note: Sorry for the silence. My age and condition only permits this kind of intervention. Apologies. vvr Part 4, contd. from part-3 In the period of over 5 centuries after the untimely disappearance of Sankaracharya and before the advent of Ramanujacharya, the emotionally based Vaishnavism meekly evolved slowly but surely as a counter-weight to the 'logically' overweighted but powerful Advaitha. All shades of spiritual activities in this period, underwent considerable changes in the ritualistic and ontological concepts since the Vedic period. The important ones related to the sociological structures and their need for harmony in functions and hierarchy and power and politics. The rulers and the ruling class exerted great influence over this. The wise ones constructed LESS than the damage caused by the self-centered ones, with the result that the entropy in the field registered a steady increase. When Ramanujacharya came on the scene, he was great enough to realize what went wrong and how to pull things in the right direction. He was also schrewed enough to estimate the extent of opposition and the power behind it. He attributed most of the ills that have arisen to two fundamental causes, the disappearing HUMANITARIANISM and the vanishing DIGNITY of MAN (note: here expression 'man' surely includes WOMAN). He set about to initiate a socio-religious reform of rectification. Ramanujacharya was an extra-ordinarily bold and profound scholar with an eqally extra-ordinary sense of justice, charged with the ability to reform society NON-DESTRUCTIVELY. He went about this task with an un-parallelled determination, vigor and hope, for which he fully relied on divine assistance. He was totally aware of the immediate consequences over his efforts and his personal safety. The historical incidents that followed fully justify his care, concern and caution. When he started the reform, he had the royal support which did not last long. He had to rely on his own initiatives which were largely negated by traditionalists and a sizeable section of powerful and selfish Brahmins. The other sections of society following the pristine southern culture and the Dravidian brand of Bhakthi largely supported his revolutionary ideas and saw in these ideas, the kind of emancipation long overdue but deliberately withheld thus-far. To be continued... venkat v.rao, Oct.26, 1994
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Excerpt from the Mahabharata"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "nooRRandhaathi and piLLaiyandhaathi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]