tengalai vadagali issues
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 30, 1994
I just want to bring out my view on a issue that is fairly serious: mani writes: Vadagalais, on the contrary, belief that a separate surrender ('bhara-nyaasam' -- placing the burden of achieving moksha upon Him) should be performed. They also call this prapatti, SaraNaagati, and Atma-nikShEpa. This is usually done through an acharya, but I am of the opinion that ___________________________________ PerumaaL will not refuse those who do it themselves in all sincerity. Such is His nature. My views on this: I would advice mani on this particular issue not to mix personal views with the views of the vadagalai sect. The requirement of acharya is taken so seriously in that sect and the requirements of 5 angas or requirements for prapatti. I think we as " Less informed " in this science should stay with the original views as they are. personal views on these aspects should be carefully publicized. (preferably not publicised unless you know the audience in person) We should not forget that Vedanta desika did consider the idea of prapatti as a rahasya or secret. My only concern is that one might, after reading the mail, not approach an acharya for prapatti thinking that he is not needed. This will be a grave mistake for the half informed aspirant. We as part time lovers of philosophy at best can be messengers of information but not sources of information particularly on issues such as prapatti - a subject, which is already under heated criticisms by opponent schools. We can be sources of information if we have face to face conversation with the audience or else mistaken information can be imparted to public. I am not commenting on the personal view of mani. He may or may not be right. but on a network the true view of the vadagalai sect has to be represented. Preferably for this particular aspect of prapatti, I would advise the "serious aspirant on the network" to telephone or meet the author of article or have one to one conversation .... I hope, mani you understand my point. By the way, I enjoyed your previous article which de emphasizes the differences between the two schools and gave a historical and geographical basis for the differences. Krishna
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Sri Raamaanujar and aazhvaar paasurams"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: purattaasi kEttaithanil puvi uthitthOn vaazhiyE!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]