Re: purattaasi kEttaithanil puvi uthitthOn vaazhiyE!
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 29, 1994
In <199409281818.LAA09674@srirangam.esd.sgi.com>, Mani Varadarajan wrote: > >Therefore, there is no separate 'prapatti' or 'SaraNaagati' for >Thengalais, like there is for Vadagalais. Thengalais also do not >admit bhakti-yoga as a separate means, with the idea that it is >only prapatti (which is essentially realizing the nature of one's >soul) that "achieves" moksha. (Thengalai Acharyas would probably >even object to my usage of the word "achieve".) > I have heard that there are two stages in the vadagalai tradition, "samaasrayaNam" and "bharaNyaasam". Is that what you mean? I am not quite familiar, though some of my relatives will be. There are some practices which I found to differ, the number of times one does "sEvippu", for example. In my father's funeral, five years ago, I was made more aware of the differences. The vadagalai "sambandhi" of my father insisted on so many stricter rituals. The thengalai "sambandhi" was very tolerant and tried to be more adjusting. I do not know if that can be generalized. In my earlier posting on the origin, I should have added that the average 1.2% per year, should include births minus deaths, as well as conversion_in minus conversion_out etc. The percentage could have been much higher in the first few years as you mentioned, then dropped lower later. Srinivasan
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Tenkalai/Vadakalai"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Origin"
- In reply to: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: purattaasi kEttaithanil puvi uthitthOn vaazhiyE!"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: purattaasi kEttaithanil puvi uthitthOn vaazhiyE!"
- Reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: purattaasi kEttaithanil puvi uthitthOn vaazhiyE!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]