[Vidyasankar Sundaresan: double pruning and other mysteries]
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 23, 1994
------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ------- From: vidya@cco.caltech.edu (Vidyasankar Sundaresan) To: mani@sgi.sgi.com Subject: Re: double pruning and other mysteries Date: Mon, 22 Aug 1994 23:46:35 -0700 Sankara would take offence with the statement No term applicable to the individual self is applicable only to it. It must be extended to the Indwelling Divine too. By this reasoning, all the change and imperfections in the individual jiva would also be thought of as being applicable to Brahman. However Brahman remains forever in its essential nature, so such change cannot be really applicable to Brahman at all. Again, the whole problem boils down to whether the world is regarded as real as Brahman or not. For Sankara, the world is real but not ultimately real. Thus svatah pramana, paratah apramana. By itself, we apprehend only the world, and so see only the world as real, but once Brahman is realized, the world takes on a new meaning. It is not ultimately real, as it cannot have an existence apart from Brahman, which is sat itself. His analogy is particularly interesting. He says "Has the power to burn an existence of its own apart from the existence of fire?" The existence of the power is the same as the existence of the fire. We may think of them as separate, but in reality they are one. It is thus that this world is Brahman. Viewed apart from Brahman, which is vyavaharika satya, man's understanding of the world is faulty. Because, apart from Brahman, the world can have no existence. Still, man is able to look at the world as existent, even without knowing Brahman. It is that which is anirvachaniya. On knowing Brahman, the world is also realized to be nothing other than Brahman. This point is made very powerfully in the Vivekachudamani. I think even some later Advaitins must have taken the maya term in its popular connotation. This is probably a hangover from the prakrti idea of Samkhya. This must have been responsible for the very rejection of the idea by Ramanuja. vidya ------- end -------
- Next message: Sudarshan Iyengar H3-378: "Re: [Vidyasankar Sundaresan: double pruning and other mysteries]"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "[Vidyasankar S.: regarding 'sarira-sariri bhava']"
- Next in thread: Sudarshan Iyengar H3-378: "Re: [Vidyasankar Sundaresan: double pruning and other mysteries]"
- Maybe reply: Sudarshan Iyengar H3-378: "Re: [Vidyasankar Sundaresan: double pruning and other mysteries]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]