Re: Question re: Gaudapada Karikas.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 12, 1996
> translation of the Sribhashya. Thibaut has misidentified > some quotations as being from the Karikas. Specifically, > there is a quote, ``ajAyamAno bahudhA ...'' which can be > either from GK or from the TaittirIya AraNyaka, i.e., > second anuvAka of the purusha sUkta. I don't have the GK text handy, but if this quote is the one said to be Karika I.16 quoted as Sruti, that puts a completely different light on the question. I hope I didn't offend anybody with my comments about the age of the upanishads, and the Mimamsa & Vedanta Sutras. I did not pay much attention to this in the past, but recently I have come to think that the Vedanta traditions cannot be true to both the Mimamsasutras and Brahmasutras if they accept that the texts were written at different points of time. Unless they rationalize things by saying that mantra-drashtas lived at different periods of time, but Sruti is not affected thereby. Still, the upanishads don't have the luxury of having mantra-drashtas, because they are not mantra. Vidya
- Next message: V. Sadagopan: "Raghuveera Gadyam: Part 3"
- Previous message: Vijay Srinivasan: "Ramayanam"
- Maybe in reply to: Vidyasankar Sundaresan: "Question re: Gaudapada Karikas."
- Next in thread: Vidyasankar Sundaresan: "Re: Question re: Gaudapada Karikas."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]