Re: kamba rAmAyanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 25, 2002
/Om namO nArAyaNAya |
/namastE Shri Lakshnmi Narasimhan.
I have a question: Is it true that each one of the /AzvArs was also in charge of a temple at some stage or other? By charge I mean that the /AzvAr was directly or indirectly involved with the administration of a temple including /arcanAs.
Thanks for an interesting point of view on /kampan. I am from Karaikudi, where they still have the annual /kampan viZA.
/vantanam.
/nalan/tarum collai nAn kaNtu/koNtEn, nArAyaNa ennnum nAmam.
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "PeriyAzhwAr Thirumozhi 2.10- Kutti KaNNan has made (exhausted) our day"
- Previous message: jayasartn: "Re: Mahakavi Kamban"
- Maybe in reply to: murali vanamamalai: "kamba rAmAyanam"
- Next in thread: Lakshmi Narasimhan Venkatapathy: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]