Re: some doubts on siRiya thirumadal
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 26, 1996
--------- Received message begins Here --------- Vijay Triplicane (vijayt@acuson.com) wrote: * Sri Varadhan had brought up an interesting subject for * discussion. Before going into the details of ninda stuthi * and all i have a basic doubt here. can anybody please * clarify. [...] * My question is this: * * arraar ivaRRin idai adhanai eydhuvar * cheeraar irukalaiyum eythuvar. * Doesn't this "ivaRRin idai adhanai" mean the center of * these three which is poruL? (aRam - poruL - inbam) OR am * i missing something???? 'idai' here means 'among'. Thus "ivaRRin idai adhanai" should read as "among these [three]" and not as "the one in the middle". * In the last few lines the aazhwaar even doubts the * existence of mOksham and thereby highlights the * significance of the archaa moorthy in this earth. Could * this be bcos the aazhwaar takes the role of an innocent * bhaktha ( a girl) for whom all those concepts of mOksham * and everything is like greek and latin and hence chooses * the one easy maargam to reach HIM which is uncontrolled * love towards HIM. This is a very common motif in aazhvaar paasuram. Compare this with 'ichchuvai thavira yaan pOy indhira lOgam aaLum achchuvai peridhum vENdEn aranga maa nakar uLaanE' by thoNdar adippodi aazhvaar. * 'adhunirka * yeraarmuyalvittu kaakkaippin povadhe?' The two 'madal' works by thiru mangai aazhvaar are extremely beautiful, and in fact "revolutionary" in the sense that they were completely against the existing thamizh tradition (aazhvaar "herself" mentions that in the work) prompting later day thamizh grammarians to add special categories in their book. I eagerly look forward to Sri Sadagopan's postings on these exquisite works from thiru mangai aazhvaar. --badri -------------------------------------------------- S.Badrinarayanan Graduate Student Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University --------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: some doubts on siRiya thirumadal"
- Previous message: Tatachar_at_aol.com: "RE: Hamsa Sandesha"
- In reply to: Vijay Triplicane: "some doubts on siRiya thirumadal"
- Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: some doubts on siRiya thirumadal"
- Reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: some doubts on siRiya thirumadal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]