(no subject)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 11, 1996
Sri Dileepan writes - - (2) as it is I am happy to suspend - logic and accept the vEdhaas as unchanging truths that simply - came into existance; one more illogical concept won't hurt me - too much, and most importantly, (3) these are secondary Sir, I don't see why the claim of the Veda as an eternal truth is illogical. To quote my favorite advaitic Swami once again, :-) "by the vedas no books are meant. They are the eternal verities, the principles that form the warp and woof of the Universe. By our [hindu] conception, they are akin to a flowing river, and the rishis who discovered them were like pilgrims who dipped into them and brought the lifegiving waters to others on the banks. If ever the hindu race forgets the vedas, that river will continue to flow - they will continue to signify that eternal truth, and still constitute the principle on which the universe is built. It is in this sense that the vedas have no beginning and no end." Sounds pretty reasonable, does it not ? - Mani, I think you are a little hasty here. The hell - we are talking about is not the Christian kind, eternal. - It is just a place to compensate your bad karma; and a - little pain can be very therapeutic! One does get a chance - for atonement, in the next birth. Exactly. In no way can the puranic hell be compared to the unreasonable, cruelty for cruelty's sake hell of the god of the Christians or Muslims. The puranic hell is a temporary region where you cool your heels, pay your dues, kick yourself for having been stupid and nasty, resolve to do better and get back to get yet another chance to do it right. - - Let me repeat for good measure what I mentioned at the - beginning, I am simply accepting these notions as - described by poorvaachaaryaas; I don't see any benefit - in trying to apply logic with these. - I find both these notions quite reasonable. Indeed, since often my measure of truth is (let me confess) poetic beauty ( I am a disciple of Keats among others ), the claim of the veda rings very true. Atleast it ought to be true. Nothing has a right to be so beautiful without being true. Raghu Seshadri
- Next message: Sampath Rengarajan: "Re:RK Mutt"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Can Sri Vaishnavas count?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]