Re: Rama's banishment of Sita

From the Bhakti List Archives

Mani Varadarajan • January 18, 1996

On Jan 18,  5:05am, Jaganath.Bharadwaj@nrecatao.nreca.org wrote:
>  In fact even Mukta jivatmas are not bound by these rules.

Once again, I must insist that you clarify this statement.
What is a ``mukta jivatma''? If the jIva mukta is still living
in a conventional sense, according to Visishtadvaita, by
definition this jIva is not a mukta.  A jIva can only be
considered released if it is in Vaikuntha.

Unlike Advaita, Visishtadvaita does not have a concept
of jIvanmukti.

Mani

---

• Next message: John Grimes: "Sita"
• Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Rama's banishment of Sita"
• Next in thread: Parthasarathy Ranganathan: "Re: Vali vadam"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]